| The first work was done by Glazer 8
years ago, but it wasn't until April of 1993 that medical professionals heard about it at
the ISSVD Convention. That means, however, that since 1993 we started learning how to use
biofeedback to treat vulvodynia. Professional service providers have not studied it in
college or graduate school. At best they may have attended a weekend seminar sponsored by
experts in their professional group or by the manufacturer of their biofeedback treatment
system and computer. The vast majority of currently practicing clinicians probably have
less than two years experience treating vulvodynia with EMG biofeedback. It is a primary
purpose of Vulvodynia.com to provide on-going continuing education for such therapists. At
the same time we are finding that a majority of our WEB visitors are not professionals,
but patients seeking better therapy for their vulvodynia. It is to help the latter group
ask the right questions that this page has been developed. With respect to the application of surface electromyography to pelvic floor muscles in the treatment of vulvovaginal pain, confusion reigns supreme amongst professionals as much as amongst patients. I often hear comments from professionals which clearly indicate that they lump all muscle measurement and treatment together. They confuse manometry (intravaginal pressure readings) and electromyography. They mistake electrical stimulation for biofeedback. They refer to physical therapy and biofeedback as if they are synonymous. They refer to vulvodynia/vestibulitis as if it is vaginismus (a psychological condition leading to circumvaginal muscles closing off the vaginal opening with attempted penetration). They refer to surface electromyography as if it is fine wire electromyography (a very painful measurement of individual muscle fibers by needle insertion of fine wire directly into the muscle). They mistake biofeedback as a psychological rather than a physical intervention (because biofeedback has its historical roots in the field of psychology) reinforcing inappropriate views held by many that all vulvovaginal pain disorders are essentially psychological. They use the term biofeedback and physical therapy as if they are the same interventions (which they emphatically are NOT). Is it any wonder that patients are confused when the professionals making the referrals hold so many misconceptions about this therapeutic intervention! Surface Electromyographic Assisted pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation (Biofeedback) treatment of vulvovaginal pain is a very specific treatment. It involves the use of very specific instruments, software, home training devices, daily exercise protocols and muscle monitoring, specified schedules of office electromyographic evaluations as the basis for determining appropriate at home exercise variables (e.g. number of repetitions, contract duration, relax duration, contract onset/offset times, stability training, spectral frequency training, to mention a few) . You will find many practitioners who do not conduct treatment in line with any of the above parameters but claim to be conducting biofeedback. This may be a valid claim, they may well be conducting biofeedback. What they are NOT conducting is the GLAZER PROTOCOL. So what is so important about which protocol is used? Well, it is pretty simple actually. With respect to pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation in the tretment of vulvovaginal pain disorders, ONLY the GLAZER PROTOCOL has been shown to be EFFECTIVE by medical research standards (those standards accepted by the medical community and used by insurance companies to determine reimbursement). This standard involves the collection and analysis of data relating to the effectiveness of the treatment and the publication of this data in a peer reviewed medical journal. Other treatments may be effective but they have NOT demonstrated their effectiveness by this standard. BIOFEEDBACK for vulvovaginal pain remains a PATIENT BEWARE market. I urge you to evaluate your practitioners carefully. DO NOT accept verbal claims of treatment outcome. Neither patient nor practitioner beliefs or unsubstantiated claims about effectiveness are an acceptable standard. Ask your practitioner to see their documented sEMG and patient symptom reports and satisfaction data. If they cannot demonstrate that either 1. They are conducting the GLAZER PROTOCOL in which they have been adequately trained or 2. That they are conducting an alternate treatment protocol which has been demonstrated to be effective, then you have no basis to expect a positive treatment outcome. Listed below are some questions that you can ask a potential therapist to screen for a promising one, or to review your past therapy and find out if you've really been there, done that. You should not hesitate to ask your therapist these questions, and if you are not satisfied, go somewhere else and try again. After each question we've listed some of the factors which should be weighed in evaluating the professional's answer.
What's a "GOOD SCORE"?We have not attempted to "score" this checklist because the answers are so variable. But in general, the more "right" answers you get, the better the therapy, and the better the therapy, the more likely you are to get better! So, what if your proposed therapist did not score a Perfect "10"? Depending on the issues, you might still be far better off than if you prematurely elect a non-reversible therapy with a high risk of side-effects. As they teach in Massage Class, "Remember, any touch is better than no touch at all!" The only danger in getting BAD biofeedback is that you will not get better, but you'll think you have already tried and "it" failed. Maybe it wasn't the instrument or the patient, but the untrained therapist who is to blame. One alternative is to find someone who is Very Good in either Biofeedback, or Nursing, or Physical Therapy, and encourage them to review this checklist (and the Glazer Protocol) and learn how to help you, and people like you. They may not realize how many potential patients are waiting for help. To find out more about biofeedback in general, visit the website of the AABP - the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. To find out more about the EMG Treatment of other pelvic muscle dysfunctions, check out the topics listed on the home page of InContiNet. Copyright 1997 by John D. Perry & Howard I. Glazer |
Home | Products & Services | Research & Articles | Connect with others | Dr Glazer | Professional Area |